Bottom line
1. Which Council powers apply
| Tool | Application |
|---|---|
| Ordinance | Draft a defined stabilization system: covered units, annual adjustment, hardship relief, exemptions, anti-evasion rules, registration, enforcement, and appeals. |
| City-assisted housing | Place rent and affordability covenants on units receiving city land, tax exemptions, fee waivers, grants, bonds, or Affordable Housing Fund support. |
| Budget | Fund a rental registry, tenant education, enforcement, data analysis, rental assistance, and eviction prevention. |
| Tax and zoning incentives | Exchange tax relief, density, reduced fees, or city land for long-term rent restrictions and tenant protections. |
| State advocacy | Adopt a resolution and work with Oʻahu legislators for explicit county authority. |
| Audit/reporting | Measure rent increases, evictions, exemptions, subsidy performance, and enforcement outcomes. |
What Jason can do personally
- Request an OCS memorandum comparing HRS §46-1.5, landlord-tenant statutes, constitutional limits, and preemption case law.
- Ask OCS to draft both a city ordinance and model state enabling language.
- Convene tenants, small landlords, nonprofit providers, economists, and legal aid.
- Introduce a resolution placing explicit county authority on the state legislative agenda.
What requires others
Five votes are normally needed for a local ordinance; six for a veto override. The mayor must administer registration and enforcement. State authorization requires the Legislature and governor.
2. A credible Council action package
- Immediate city-controlled protections. Require long affordability and rent limits whenever a project receives city land, exemptions, waivers, grants, or housing funds.
- Rental market data. Create a privacy-protected registry and publish rent, vacancy, eviction, and ownership trends.
- Model stabilization ordinance. Include an inflation-linked adjustment, owner/new-construction rules, capital-improvement relief, anti-harassment, and independent appeals.
- State enabling campaign. Seek clear statutory authorization rather than years of avoidable litigation.
- Implementation budget. Fund staff, software, outreach, hearing officers, and legal defense.
3. Legal and operational limits
- Preemption: HRS §46-1.5 gives counties broad powers and references rental conditions, but does not clearly settle a comprehensive local rent ceiling.
- 2025 legislative signal: SB1133 proposed explicit county authority and did not complete enactment. That signals uncertainty; it is not a court ruling.
- Takings and due process: the system needs reasonable adjustments, hardship relief, notice, standards, and appeals.
- Supply and maintenance: exemptions and capital rules must avoid withdrawal and deferred maintenance.
- Administration: a cap without registry and enforcement produces selective compliance.
Do not overclaim: “Rent control is unquestionably within Council power” is too strong. Use undisputed city leverage immediately and seek explicit state authority for the wider market.
4. Recent Honolulu examples
SB1133 (2025)
The state bill would have authorized counties to establish rental-price ceilings. It advanced in the Senate and stopped after House referral in March 2025, supporting a two-level city/state strategy.
Bill 63 (2024)
Honolulu extended certain ADU fee waivers, showing use of development costs and incentives to advance housing supply.
Bill 46 (2024)
The empty homes tax proposal shows Council willingness to change housing-market incentives while working through definitions, exemptions, and administration.
5. Debate practice
“Rent stabilization is a serious policy, so I will treat the law seriously. The Council can put rent limits on city-assisted housing immediately, create the data and enforcement capacity we lack, and introduce a complete stabilization framework. Because broad private-market caps raise a real state-law question, I will also seek explicit authority from the Legislature. Tenants deserve action that survives court and works in practice.”
“The Council’s strongest immediate leverage comes from benefits the city controls. When a project receives city land, a tax exemption, a fee waiver, or Affordable Housing Fund money, the public can require long-term rent limits and tenant protections. For the wider market, I would have OCS publish a legal analysis, draft a full ordinance, and prepare state enabling legislation. The bill must include a reasonable annual adjustment, hardship and capital-improvement procedures, anti-evasion rules, registration, enforcement, and appeals. I would budget the system before promising a start date. My goal is durable protection, not a slogan that collapses under litigation or cannot be administered.”
6. Hard questions and disciplined answers
“Can the Council legally cap rents—yes or no?”
Answer: “The county has broad housing and rental-regulation powers, but a comprehensive local ceiling is not clearly settled. I will use undisputed city leverage now and pursue explicit state authority.”
“Won’t landlords stop maintaining buildings?”
Answer: “A credible system includes documented capital adjustments, hardship relief, inspections, and anti-retaliation rules.”
“Why not just build more housing?”
Answer: “Supply, public housing, tenant stability, and vacancy policy solve different parts of the crisis. I support all four.”
“Is this empty if the state must act?”
Answer: “No. The city can impose affordability conditions, fund tenant protection and data, and place a fully drafted enabling bill before the Legislature.”
7. Facts and phrases to memorize
- Ordinary ordinance: 5 votes; veto override: 6.
- Strongest immediate authority: city land, money, tax benefits, fees, and zoning incentives.
- Direct private-market ceiling: preemption analysis required.
- Never promise a cap without registry, staffing, appeals, and enforcement.
- Phrase: “Durable protection that survives court and works in practice.”
8. Sources
This file is self-contained and print-ready. Use the browser’s Print command to save a local PDF if needed.