Bottom line
1. Which Council powers apply
| Power | Application |
|---|---|
| Ethics ordinances | Define gifts, prohibited sources, conflicts, recusal, disclosure, post-employment, penalties, and training. |
| Lobbying rules | Expand registration, client/issue disclosure, compensation ranges, meeting calendars, filings, and searchability. |
| Procurement transparency | Publish solicitations, bidders, scoring, contracts, beneficial ownership, subcontractors, amendments, and performance. |
| Budget transparency | Publish member amendments, sponsor, amount, purpose, recipient, district, and vote before final action. |
| Audits/investigations | Direct performance audits and authorize formal investigation of city operations or legislative subjects. |
| Appointments | Use confirmation hearings to test independence, qualifications, conflicts, and transparency commitments. |
| Charter amendment | Place structural changes before voters with six votes at each reading. |
2. A credible Council action package
- Public influence register. Searchable lobbyist clients, issues, decisions sought, compensation range, and official meetings.
- Open amendment window. Publish substantive bill and budget amendments with sponsor and redline before the vote, with a narrow emergency exception.
- Contract portal. Link solicitation, bidders, scores, beneficial ownership, award, amendments, change orders, invoices, and closeout.
- Gift/conflict review. Evaluate Bill 23 implementation, close loopholes, publish guidance and recusal records.
- Audit follow-through. Public tracker of every recommendation, agency response, due date, status, and evidence.
- Independent resources. Adequately fund Ethics, Auditor, Clerk, OCS, and procurement oversight while protecting independence.
- Structural ballot measure. Use Charter amendment when ordinance cannot solve the problem.
3. Legal and operational limits
- Independence: elected officials should fund lawful systems without directing individual Ethics, Auditor, Prosecutor, or police cases.
- Due process: allegations are not findings; rules need notice, standards, adjudication, and appeal.
- State law: reforms operate within statewide Sunshine and public-record laws.
- Privacy/security: do not publish protected personal, security, or procurement-sensitive information.
- Burden: generate structured data through normal workflows rather than duplicative reports.
- Emergencies: any amendment-posting exception must be narrow and recorded.
Do not overclaim: “I will investigate and prosecute corruption” confuses legislative oversight with independent enforcement. Promise rules, disclosure, resources, audits, referrals, and due process.
4. Recent Honolulu examples
Bill 23 (2024)
The Council enacted more specific gift restrictions, including a $50 threshold in covered circumstances and prohibited-source rules.
Ethics Commission records
Recent records show the Council’s appointment role and the commission’s disclosure and lobbyist systems.
Resolution 25-4
The proposed performance audit illustrates independent review when program and financial controls are questioned.
Resolution 24-105
The Council advanced a structural Salary Commission Charter change to voters.
5. Debate practice
“Anti-corruption starts with a complete public decision trail. I would make lobbying contacts searchable, publish substantive amendments before votes, open contracts from solicitation through change orders, and track every audit recommendation to completion. Bill 23 shows the Council can enact concrete ethics rules. Enforcement must remain independent; the Council’s job is to write strong law, fund watchdogs, disclose influence, and act on verified findings.”
“Honolulu can make corruption harder by making influence and money visible before decisions are final. I would create a public influence register covering lobbyist clients, issues, compensation ranges, and official meetings. Substantive bill and budget amendments should be posted with a redline, sponsor, amount, and purpose. A contract portal should show bidders, scores, beneficial ownership, award, amendments, change orders, payments, and performance. We should review Bill 23 implementation, close gift and conflict loopholes, and publish recusal records. I would require a public tracker for City Auditor recommendations. The Council must fund independent watchdogs while never directing an individual case. Structural gaps can go to voters through a Charter amendment.”
6. Hard questions and disciplined answers
“Are you accusing the current Council?”
Answer: “I am proposing systems that protect honest officials and the public. Reform should not depend on accusing someone without evidence.”
“Will disclosure deter meetings?”
Answer: “Constituent access should remain easy. Paid influence seeking a decision should be visible.”
“Can you order an Ethics investigation?”
Answer: “No. Enforcement must remain independent. Council can write law, appoint through the Charter process, fund capacity, request general reports, and refer evidence.”
“Will data systems cost money?”
Answer: “Design structured data into procurement, Clerk, and lobbying workflows. Transparency can reduce abuse and investigative cost.”
7. Facts and phrases to memorize
- Recent direct precedent: Bill 23 gift restrictions.
- Audit: Council resolution; formal investigation: Council/authorized committee.
- Charter amendment: three readings, 6 votes each, voter approval.
- Strengthen independent enforcement; do not control cases.
- Phrase: “The full decision trail should be public.”
8. Sources
- Jason Liang platform: anti-corruption and transparency
- Honolulu Charter §§3-114, 3-120, 3-502, Article XI, §13-105, and Article XV
- Bill 23 gifts and ethics
- Council article on Bill 23
- Ethics Commission April 17, 2024 minutes
- Resolution 25-4 audit example
- June 5, 2024 Council action including Resolution 24-105
This file is self-contained and print-ready. Use the browser’s Print command to save a local PDF if needed.